WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript <www.descript.com>

00:00:00.540 --> 00:00:02.850
As the president digs in on tariffs,

00:00:02.910 --> 00:00:06.510
jobs, and factories will come
roaring back into our country.

00:00:06.540 --> 00:00:10.260
Ridicule, pouring in on social
media with memes going viral.

00:00:10.440 --> 00:00:14.280
We don't know where exactly they're
coming from, but this one, an AI generated

00:00:14.280 --> 00:00:15.960
video, crudely showing Americans.

00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:18.030
Doing factory labor raising.

00:00:18.030 --> 00:00:21.480
The question, is a manufacturing
renaissance in the United States

00:00:21.570 --> 00:00:25.200
possible and would it provide
jobs that people here want?

00:00:25.410 --> 00:00:29.189
If we mean sending us back to that
world in which manufacturing was

00:00:29.189 --> 00:00:31.710
a third of US employment, there's
just no way that would happen.

00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:35.550
Could we re industrialize the economy
and add millions of working class jobs?

00:00:35.910 --> 00:00:36.660
Absolutely.

00:00:36.780 --> 00:00:38.280
Clearly plenty of disagreement.

00:00:38.340 --> 00:00:39.540
So what would it take?

00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:41.430
Let's rewind to the 1970s.

00:00:41.580 --> 00:00:44.675
Back then, nearly 20 million people in
the United States made their livings.

00:00:45.020 --> 00:00:48.770
From manufacturing, accounting for
more than a fifth of total employment.

00:00:49.190 --> 00:00:53.960
The US was a leading producer of
everything from cars to planes to steel.

00:00:54.500 --> 00:00:56.450
So it was a really big
deal for the US economy.

00:00:56.540 --> 00:01:00.770
And what made it an especially big
deal is that those jobs paid really

00:01:00.770 --> 00:01:03.260
good wages and that allowed workers.

00:01:03.675 --> 00:01:07.065
With just a high school degree, or
not even a high school degree, to

00:01:07.065 --> 00:01:08.715
attain a middle class lifestyle,

00:01:08.985 --> 00:01:12.495
but then globalization starting in
the eighties, NAFTA in the nineties,

00:01:12.495 --> 00:01:15.765
China joining the World Trade
Organization at the turn of the century.

00:01:16.125 --> 00:01:17.595
It all shocked the system.

00:01:17.835 --> 00:01:21.884
Cheaper labor abroad meant lower
prices and closed factories Here.

00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:23.640
What we call the China trade Shock.

00:01:23.820 --> 00:01:28.380
Now, manufacturing employs only about
8% of the nation's workers, and to give

00:01:28.380 --> 00:01:32.880
you a sense of the wage gap, on average
manufacturing jobs make $35 an hour.

00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:36.300
Now, in Vietnam, for example,
that rate is about a dollar 20.

00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:40.260
Many economists who study these
massive trends are skeptical about the

00:01:40.290 --> 00:01:42.270
ability of tariffs to turn back time.

00:01:42.360 --> 00:01:45.030
We want to think about
how to create good jobs.

00:01:45.320 --> 00:01:49.759
For the workers of the future, we
should be having a substantial focus on

00:01:49.759 --> 00:01:54.080
how we do that in the service sectors
that are are vibrant now and that are

00:01:54.080 --> 00:01:56.300
likely to emerge in the coming years.

00:01:56.509 --> 00:01:59.270
But many in the domestic
manufacturing industry believe

00:01:59.270 --> 00:02:00.560
in what President Trump is doing.

00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:00.590
I.

00:02:00.940 --> 00:02:05.860
We are now, I would argue in a bipartisan
era that tariffs are an important tool

00:02:05.860 --> 00:02:10.210
in the toolbox for industrial strategy
and to reshore domestic production.

00:02:10.330 --> 00:02:13.540
He acknowledges we won't be able to
make things as cheaply as they do in

00:02:13.540 --> 00:02:17.200
China or many other countries, but
thinks the job creation is worth it.

00:02:17.350 --> 00:02:21.100
However, many of the manufacturing
jobs of old were dangerous, dirty,

00:02:21.115 --> 00:02:23.200
and difficult across the economy.

00:02:23.200 --> 00:02:26.560
38 workers a day died in the US in 1970.

00:02:26.770 --> 00:02:28.420
Now the number is less than half that.

00:02:29.054 --> 00:02:31.815
There's also concern about the
potential environmental impact.

00:02:32.265 --> 00:02:36.524
Even if we're able to bring more
manufacturing back to the states, our

00:02:36.524 --> 00:02:39.795
environmental laws are there for a
reason and it's, it's to prevent what

00:02:39.795 --> 00:02:45.345
we saw at the turn of the 20th century
with cities that were cloaked in smog.

00:02:45.390 --> 00:02:51.630
With rivers that caught on fire with, uh,
toxics leaking into our water supplies.

00:02:51.750 --> 00:02:54.929
Other things that are different now
from America's post-war industrial

00:02:54.929 --> 00:02:58.019
age union membership was more
than a third of the workforce.

00:02:58.109 --> 00:03:02.010
Now it's about a 10th and tax rates
on the wealthy we're above 70% in

00:03:02.010 --> 00:03:04.589
1980, and now are about half that

00:03:04.649 --> 00:03:08.250
we are shedding excess labor in.

00:03:08.895 --> 00:03:09.915
The federal government

00:03:09.915 --> 00:03:12.345
Treasury Secretary Scott Ascent,
telling Tucker Carlson that

00:03:12.345 --> 00:03:15.705
government employees losing their
jobs now could work in factories

00:03:15.705 --> 00:03:19.785
that will give us the labor that
we need for the new manufacturing.

00:03:19.935 --> 00:03:21.615
Which brings us back to the memes.

00:03:21.795 --> 00:03:24.525
Will office workers really
wanna hit the factory floor?

00:03:24.615 --> 00:03:28.485
The industry saying bringing those jobs
back will spur innovation and automation

00:03:28.785 --> 00:03:30.915
leading to better manufacturing jobs.

00:03:31.230 --> 00:03:35.760
If you talk to any person that runs a
factory, that's a CEO of a company that

00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:40.230
produces in the us, they will tell you
that innovation happens closest to the

00:03:40.230 --> 00:03:42.450
factory floor or on the factory floor.

00:03:42.510 --> 00:03:45.690
Are we going to have, you know,
new technologies making the

00:03:45.690 --> 00:03:48.450
processes better, more streamlined?

00:03:48.450 --> 00:03:49.320
Absolutely.

00:03:49.440 --> 00:03:53.550
That's if the factories are built, the
jobs are open, and the pay is good enough.

00:03:54.525 --> 00:03:55.815
What a great report, Yasmin.

00:03:55.815 --> 00:03:58.005
You know, I mean, everybody I've
talked to and I've spent a lot

00:03:58.005 --> 00:03:59.655
of time in, uh, factories Yeah.

00:03:59.655 --> 00:04:03.255
On my beach, you know, various
airplane or car plants.

00:04:03.525 --> 00:04:06.075
Uh, it takes three to five
years to build a new factory.

00:04:06.075 --> 00:04:06.435
Right.

00:04:06.495 --> 00:04:09.525
So is there a disconnect between what
the Trump administration wants when it

00:04:09.525 --> 00:04:13.845
comes to bringing back these jobs and the
economic impact of the tariffs and how

00:04:13.845 --> 00:04:18.404
long it will take to actually kick up and
create this kind of a new industrial base?

00:04:18.644 --> 00:04:18.915
Right.

00:04:18.915 --> 00:04:20.925
And, and the length of time I
think is a really good point,

00:04:20.925 --> 00:04:22.395
Tom, because that's about right.

00:04:22.395 --> 00:04:25.515
Investment and steady investment
stability really, I should say.

00:04:25.515 --> 00:04:27.675
And it, and with the economists that I've
been speaking to, essentially they're

00:04:27.675 --> 00:04:29.235
saying, okay, great, great idea, right?

00:04:29.235 --> 00:04:33.015
Let's bring manufacturing, um, back
to the United States, made in USA.

00:04:33.045 --> 00:04:34.155
Doesn't that seem great?

00:04:34.185 --> 00:04:34.485
Okay.

00:04:34.485 --> 00:04:35.565
Well, here's the issue though.

00:04:35.775 --> 00:04:37.545
That takes a heck of a lot of investment.

00:04:37.545 --> 00:04:40.035
As you mentioned, in a lot of time
we're talking about billions upon

00:04:40.035 --> 00:04:43.005
billions of dollars, companies,
countries, so on and so forth.

00:04:43.515 --> 00:04:47.535
If they're gonna invest
that type of money, Tom.

00:04:47.580 --> 00:04:49.469
Yeah, they need stability.

00:04:50.190 --> 00:04:54.210
They need to make sure their
investment is going to pay off and

00:04:54.210 --> 00:04:55.770
there won't be a rocky road ahead.

00:04:56.190 --> 00:04:59.969
And what these economists are telling
me is everything with the way the

00:04:59.969 --> 00:05:02.820
markets have been going over the last
couple of days, and the way in which

00:05:02.820 --> 00:05:06.780
these tariffs have been instituted
points directly away from opposite

00:05:06.780 --> 00:05:09.210
from stability to instability.

00:05:09.210 --> 00:05:13.530
Hence why it is they disagree with
the way in which the president is

00:05:13.530 --> 00:05:16.049
going about bringing manufacturing
back to the United States.

00:05:16.495 --> 00:05:19.135
You know, and I don't think anybody
disagrees with the need to bring

00:05:19.135 --> 00:05:20.755
manufacturing back if possible.

00:05:20.755 --> 00:05:24.355
But let's be clear, modern
manufacturing is not the people that

00:05:24.355 --> 00:05:26.275
we saw on that spot from the 1970s.

00:05:26.305 --> 00:05:27.835
It's robots.

00:05:27.895 --> 00:05:29.695
It's robotic assembly lines.

00:05:29.695 --> 00:05:29.996
Right, right.

00:05:30.001 --> 00:05:33.265
You've got a fraction of the number
of people working in factories today.

00:05:33.960 --> 00:05:34.830
Yeah, e exactly right.

00:05:34.830 --> 00:05:37.560
And that's actually something that I spoke
with one of our guests about earlier today

00:05:37.560 --> 00:05:38.640
as we were putting this piece together.

00:05:38.640 --> 00:05:41.820
I said, listen, you talk about
bringing jobs back to this country.

00:05:41.849 --> 00:05:45.300
Okay, but how many of those jobs
are gonna be taken up by robotics?

00:05:45.300 --> 00:05:46.289
Yeah, by ai.

00:05:46.289 --> 00:05:49.349
Howard Lutnick himself and advisors
to the president said, essentially,

00:05:49.349 --> 00:05:50.550
we're looking to robotics.

00:05:50.550 --> 00:05:51.719
We are looking to ai.

00:05:51.719 --> 00:05:55.500
He argued, um, his point saying
in fact though, um, along with

00:05:55.500 --> 00:05:59.190
robotics, along with ai, there will
be job creation, but nonetheless.

00:05:59.510 --> 00:06:03.920
Many of those jobs will go to the robotics
and to the ai, and that is certainly yet

00:06:03.920 --> 00:06:07.460
another concern with this manufacturing
renaissance that we're talking about.

